| Surely trial marriage makes sense? |
|
|
|
|
No sex before marriage is an outdated idea. Surely a trial marriage makes sense? Before we make a lifelong commitment, we want to check that out?
Today, more than ever before, many of your friends have slept with several different partners. Ask them about sex. Do they ever say "Ah, yes, shame about X - we were sexually incompatible?" No! They look at you in surprise and say "Oh, sex is just sex, pretty much the same with whoever".
There are still many countries which practise "arranged marriages". Did you ever hear of such a couple seeking a divorce because of "sexual incompatibility"?
Making love, like persuading, or arguing, or kissing, is not a matter of compatibility - it will work with anyone. But it IS something you gradually get better at with your partner, as you develop skill and come to understand them better. If you're going to marry someone, you have two choices.
One is to make the commitment first, unite yourselves together for ever, promise each other lifelong fidelity. (That is marriage - it means "tied together for life" - it has nothing to do with getting a signed piece of paper. Who cares about papers?) Then, in the security of that promise, you can begin your mutual sex life, experimenting gently and lovingly as you gradually discover what your partner enjoys.
The other is to make it a test! You can say to your partner "Well, let's have sex a few times and see if it's good enough. If not, we won't get married. You have to reach a reasonable standard if I am to marry you."
Which do you think is more likely to succeed?
OK, you're thinking, but surely it's necessary to find out if we can live together? Not just sex - suppose she can't stand my farts, or whatever?
Oh, YES! Indeed you must find out. Remember that old-fashioned thing there used to be called an "engagement"? Remember how Joseph was "betrothed" to Mary? An engagment went on for months. It was a time when you could be together often, even go on holiday together, eat meals together, cook for your beloved, discover your tastes and your ideals. There certainly are things that can make you incompatible! If she wants children and you don't - it won't work. If you want to live near your mother in Italy and he doesn't - ...
But to discover those things you don't need to move in together or have sex. Strangely enough, it's actually EASIER to get to know someone when you're not cohabiting. For example: suppose his frequent swearing really upsets and embarrasses you? It's much harder to tell him when you're already living together - he'll be in a bad temper over it for hours or days, and you have nowhere to go. So you bottle it up and say nothing, and he doesn't find out for ages.
But won't I be a clumsy ignoramus if I'm a virgin on my wedding night?
Yes - and your partner will love it to pieces! People are so sweet when they're naive and learning. ... Or would you rather have your beloved say "Mm, that was nice, you're as good as Robin was"?
Ever wonder why Christian marriages last longer than non-Christian ones?
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites |



"Sexual incompatibility" is a brilliant invention - it has tricked countless women into having sex before they really wanted to. (And perhaps men.) But does it exist? Where is the evidence?
Comments
All I can say is that God in my life makes for a better marriage in my life.
(Only married one time.)
no fooling's comment re adultery being punishable by death is old covenant Jewish law. The laws that still apply, or are carried over to the new testament are moral ones such as do not kill, Thats a good one, but municipal laws of the old test. do not apply today, we are no longer under the law unlike our Muslim friends if my limited understanding of the muslim faith is accurate
Dave
But seems like he was wrong?
In 2010 he repeated his own study, and found the opposite! "... population segments with the lowest likelihood of having been divorced subsequent to marriage are Catholics (28%), evangelicals (26%) ....", whereas ".... 30% of atheists and agnostics had been married and subsequently divorced".
[http://www.barna.org/family-kids-articles/42-new-marriage-and-divorce-statistics-released]
Even this result is flawed, by two serious errors in his research.
First, Barna's samples are almost all Christians. For example, the 2010 study contacted 3,792 persons, of whom only 7% were atheists. This make his findings for atheists unreliable.
Second, divorce is no longer a good indicator of marital stability. We know a single mother with 3 children, each from a different failed romance - but she has never been divorced! If you don't marry, you don't divorce.
So what is the truth? Is there any reliable evidence?
Yes. In February 2010 the US Department of Health published a study of 12,571 people (about 20% unbelievers) and asked "How Long Do First Marriages and First Cohabitations Last?"
[http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_028.pdf]
They found that, after 10 years:
- of couples who married the Biblical way, 65% were still together
- of couples who cohabited before marriage, 35% were still together
- couples who never bothered to marry did even worse.
This doesn't prove God exists. But it does show that the Christian way works better. The evidence suggests that couples who pray together actually DO stay together - about twice as often.
We have all of these forces that should be working to keep them married:
The marriage is performed in God's presence...
...in God's house...
...in front of God's representative (a minister or priest)...
...and in front of many Christian witnesses.
The couple presumably prays before and after the wedding for a good marriage...
...as do all of the witnesses...
...and the minister/priest.
The couple knows that if they divorce/remarry, it is an act of adultery...
...which God has forbidden...
...and which the Bible says is punishable by death.
However, when you look at the statistics, born-again christians are MORE LIKELY to divorce, and most other christians are about the same as the general populace (see http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm).
Looking at the statistics, it seems socio-economic status has more influence than what figurehead you pray to.
RSS feed for comments to this post.